Is Dysport Superior to Botox?
In the realm of cosmetic treatments for wrinkles and fine lines, Dysport and Botox are the two leading names that come up. Both are neuromodulators derived from botulinum toxin type A, but despite their similarities, many practitioners and patients find Dysport to have certain advantages over Botox. I’ve noticed this with my patients as well, so I decided to delve into the reasons why Dysport is often considered superior.
Faster Onset of Action
One of the most significant advantages of Dysport is its rapid onset of action. Clinical studies and anecdotal evidence suggest that Dysport tends to show effects within 2-3 days post-injection, whereas Botox typically takes 3-5 days, and on ocassion we see an effect in just 24 hours. For individuals seeking quick results, whether for a special event or personal preference, Dysport's faster-acting nature is a substantial benefit.
Diffusion and Spread
Dysport has a unique molecular structure that allows it to diffuse more widely than Botox once injected. This characteristic can be particularly advantageous in treating larger areas with fewer injection points. For example, in the treatment of forehead lines, Dysport’s ability to spread can result in a more even and natural appearance. Botox, on the other hand, tends to stay more localized, which can sometimes lead to a more rigid or unnatural look if not administered correctly.
Efficacy in Treating Certain Area
Because of its broader diffusion, Dysport is often preferred for treating areas like the crow’s feet (lines around the eyes) and forehead wrinkles. This broader spread can cover these areas more effectively with fewer injections. Some of my colleagues also believe that Dysport may provide a softer and more natural look compared to Botox, particularly in these dynamic regions of the face. I’m not quite sold on that, but Botox certainly takes a more skilled injector for certain areas.
Longer Duration of Effect
While the duration of effect can vary between individuals, some studies and clinical experiences suggest that Dysport’s results might last slightly longer than those of Botox. On average, Dysport treatments may last about 4-5 months, whereas Botox effects typically last around 3-4 months. This longer duration can mean fewer visits to the practitioner, which is a significant advantage for many patients.
Lower Risk of Antibody Formation
Repeated use of botulinum toxin can sometimes lead to the development of neutralizing antibodies, which reduce the efficacy of the treatment over time. Some research indicates that Dysport may have a lower risk of antibody formation compared to Botox. This makes Dysport a preferable option for individuals who require regular injections over many years.
Cost-Effectiveness
While the cost of Dysport and Botox treatments can vary widely depending on the provider and geographical location, Dysport is often perceived as being more cost-effective. This is partially due to it costing less per unit, but there’s a bit more to it than that.
Dysport’s ability to cover larger areas with fewer units can reduce the overall amount needed for effective treatment, or more likely, allows us to cover larger areas and get more done. Also, the treatments tend to last longer, reducing the duration between appointments and touch ups.
Therefore, while a single treatment may not cost less than a Botox treatment, we will be able to provide more thorough coverage, Generally speaking our patients do not pay less for a treatment, the value they receive is significantly higher.
Does this mean Dysport is better than Botox? What does it mean?
While both Dysport and Botox have proven to be effective and safe treatments for reducing the appearance of wrinkles and fine lines, Dysport offers several notable advantages. Its faster onset of action, broader diffusion, potential for longer-lasting results, lower risk of antibody formation, and cost-effectiveness make it an attractive option for many patients and practitioners alike. So why do we still use Botox?
In science, it’s not as easy as “this is the best,” which is why Dr. Prieto is constantly reviewing scientific studies on efficacy, patient reactions, and how to best utilize a particular product or medications. We still use Botox in the practice, and regardless of where you go, it is essential to consult with a qualified and experienced professional to determine the most appropriate treatment based on individual needs and goals.
During our consults, we consider your personal preferences, specific aesthetic concerns, and the practitioner's expertise which will ultimately guide the best choice between Dysport and Botox for achieving optimal cosmetic outcomes.
Dr Nerissa Prieto, M.D.
All Rights Reserved 2024©